CapitalGuard fit
Teams worried about what coding agents can read, edit, run, summarize, and expose.
Scanner comparison
Why AI-agent exposure review is different from ordinary code bug scanning, dependency scanning, or static analysis.
CapitalGuard fit
Teams worried about what coding agents can read, edit, run, summarize, and expose.
Generic code scanners fit
Teams looking for known vulnerability patterns, dependency issues, and code-quality defects.
Price frame
CapitalGuard sells the agent-exposure review as a fixed license instead of another broad scanner seat.
Decision matrix
Recommendation
Use the first CapitalGuard report to decide whether the buyer needs more scans, support, monitoring, or deeper manual work. The first purchase should clarify scope, not create subscription drag.
Related comparisons
Subscription comparison
When a one-time AI-agent exposure license is cleaner than adding another monthly security product before the repo risk is known.
Read comparisonService comparison
When to buy a fixed-scope AI-agent exposure license before commissioning a slower manual security engagement.
Read comparisonPolicy comparison
When a checklist is enough and when a paid CapitalGuard license gives stronger evidence for AI-agent repository risk.
Read comparison